Legal Opinion · Dissent

Webster v. Body Dynamics, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 2010No. 1D08-5114Published

1DissentThomas, J.

I respectfully dissent. The trial court abused its discretion in excluding evidence that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalled and banned ephedrine-alkaloid containing products in 2004, six years after Appellant allegedly ingested such a product. Without question, the trial court erred as a matter of law in its view that this evidence was not relevant to prove that Appellees had notice of the dangers of these products. Notice is not an element of a strict liability claim, and this was not a basis to exclude the evidence. Thus, on this basis alone, this court could reverse, utilizing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hessen v. Jaguar Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Rose v. Figgie International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Stinson v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Toole v. McClintockCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. SHANDS TEACHING HOSP. AND CLINICS v. DunnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API