People v. Marsh
Criminal Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMilton Shalleck, J.
The facts in this ease are simple. The legal question is uncomplicated. The problem is to arrive at the answer. For there is novelty here; and analysis can stem, not from direct precedent, but from trends indicated by the few' cases having applicability.
Prior to a 1963 legislative change in subdivision 1 of section 177 of the Code :of Criminal Procedure, there could be no reason to write. It would suffice to cite as decisive People v. Dreares (15 A D 2d 204, affd. 11 N Y 2d 906)., But the District Attorney says that that holding is no longer conclusive. We shall see.
THE FACTS '
Defendant was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Di ReSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- People v. HavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chirieleison v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975