Legal Opinion

Horton v. Huiet

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1966No. 41686PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ebbrhakut, Judge.

1. A notice to produce may be served

on the opposite party to any proceeding requiring the production of records, documents, books, etc. which contain evidence pertinent to the cause in question. Code § 38-801. See also Code Ann. § 38-2109. If it appears from an inspection of the notice that the records and documents sought are not relevant to the issues before the court it is not error to refuse an order for their production. E. Frederics, Inc. v. Felton Beauty Supply Co., 58 Ga. App. 320 (8) (198 SE 324). It is obvious that the records and documents listed in the notice here…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. E. Frederics Inc. v. Felton Beauty Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Gow v. Charlotte, Columbia & Augusta RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. West v. NodvinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Washburn v. Sardi's RestaurantsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Master Mortgage Corp. v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Epps Air Service, Inc. v. LampkinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. Walker v. BruhnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API