Frank Espinoza, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated and/or aggrieved employees of Defendants in the State of California v. Guardian Industries, LLC
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK ESPINOZA, individually and on Case No. 1:24-cv-00853-KES-SAB 11 behalf of all similarly situated and/or aggrieved employees of Defendants in the ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX 12 State of California, PARTE MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER 13 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING INFORMAL 14 v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE CONFERENCE 15 GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES, LLC, (ECF No. 35) 16 Defendant. 17 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for an order continuing the 19 pre-certification discovery deadline and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Domingos v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1993