Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Paull

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1950No. 21711PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HURD, J:

This is an appeal on questions of law from an order of the Probate Court removing the appellant, Lucretia Russu, as Executrix of the estate of Henry Pauli, deceased. The principal ground of error assigned is the refusal of the court to hear evidence on the issues joined upon the application for removal and opening statements of counsel.

The record shows that the appellant is the sole devisee and the executrix named in the will of the decedent; that the State of Ohio through the Division of Aid for the Aged is the sole remaining creditor by reason of a judgment obtained…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. In Re Estate of RussolilloOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In re Estate of HoppesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Estate of French v. KellyMontana Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API