Legal Opinion

Hill v. Morton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1994No. 9321SC397PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Defendant argues, correctly in our view, that the superior court erred in conducting what amounted to a new trial on the propriety of plaintiffs dismissal.

This action was initiated and tried under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 126-37(b) (1990) which provides:

An action brought in superior court by an employee who is dissatisfied with an advisory decision of the State Personnel Commission or with the action taken by the local appointing authority pursuant to the decision shall be heard upon the record and not as a trial de novo. In such an action brought by a local employee under this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Controls Corp. v. Robert L. Vesco, and Vesco & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. Beckham v. Grand Affair of North Carolina, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1987
  3. Harding v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Mitchell v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howell v. MortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Wright v. Blue Ridge Area AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API