Legal Opinion

Waldron v. Voorhies

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 15, 2009No. Case 1:07 CV 01916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

LESLEY WELLS, District Judge.

On 27 June 2007, Petitioner Douglas Waldron (“Mr. Waldron” or Petitioner) filed this timely habeas, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, setting forth the following single ground for relief:

Ground for Relief No. 1: A defendant is deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel when counsel fails to object to the admission of prejudicial, inadmissible other-acts evidence at trial.

(Doc. 1). Respondent filed a return of writ on 4 September 2007 (Doc. 8) to which Mr. Waldron responded in traverse on 5 November 2007…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsonOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  2. Keeler v. Brenntag Specialties, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API