Legal Opinion
Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. Cooney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1962No. 16842PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
This action was instituted against Robert J. Cooney, a citizen of California, doing business as Allied Enterprises, by Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, a New York corporation, as assignee and subrogee of Army and Air Force Exchange Service, a government instrumentality. National Union Fire Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, intervened pursuant to leave of court.
Cooney is an export packer, who packages goods for export. Exchange was one of his customers. On August 15, 1952, Cooney and Exchange entered into an export packing agreement whereby Cooney agreed,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lyon v. GossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Meyers v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. CrespoDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises, and National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a Corporation, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a Corporation v. Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises, Robert J. Cooney, Doing Business Under the Firm Name and Style of Allied Enterprises v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962