Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Gober
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided October 24, 2000No. 98-1825PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HOLDAWAY, Judge:
The appellant, Richard A. Dixon, appeals a June 1998 decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which concluded that entitlement to an effective date earlier than April 1994 for a 100% rating for chronic paranoid schizophrenia was not warranted based on CUE in an August 1979 rating decision. The Board remanded the appellant’s claim for entitlement to permanency of a 100% disability rating for his service-connected chronic paranoid schizophrenia for further devel- ' opment. Because the remanded claim is not yet the subject of a final Board decision, it is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Russell v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Masors v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Murincsak v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Garrett v. Hayre, Claimant-Appellant v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- 10-31 329Board of Veterans' Appeals · 2012