Legal Opinion

Howland v. Cressy

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 6, 1948No. 3747PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The defendant’s exceptions are overruled. There was ample evidence to justify the verdicts rendered by the Court and it does not appear that they were the result of any error in the proceedings. The defendant claims that there was error in the finding that he made no attempt to examine or repair the fence on the evening the cow escaped. The answer to this is that there was evidence that no repairs were made at that time and that due care required that they be made. The Court was at liberty to disbelieve the defendant’s testimony that he examined the fence, and therefore from this and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hackett v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  2. Hunt v. Goodimate Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Blaisdell v. StoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1881
  4. Kennett v. DurginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1880

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grubb v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. O'CONNOR v. BlackIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API