Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1942Published

1Per curiam

The plaintiff sued for the recovery of damages for an injury alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendant in permitting a defect in the street to remain unrepaired and in a dangerous condition. The plaintiff recovered a verdict, and -from the ensuing judgment the defendant appealed. Upon consideration of the appeal the Court was evenly divided — three to three — Justice Schenck not sitting. Therefore, the judgment of the court below stands affirmed, and this decision does not become a precedent. Smith v. Bottling Co., ante, 202, 19 S. E. (2d), 250; Adams v. Murphrey,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seay v. American Savings Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. Adams v. . MurphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API