In re Freeman Cotting Coat Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings against the Freeman Cotting Coat Company. On motions to dismiss intervening petitions.
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
The original petition was good upon its face and was brought in good faith. There is no evidence that the intervening creditors were aware of the facts upon which the estoppel *552against the principal petitioners arises, nor that they did not act in good faith in intervening. The intervening petitions were properly and seasonably filed.
The motions to dismiss the intervening petitions are severalty denied. See Re Bedingfield (D. C.) 96 Fed. 190; Re Ryan (D. C.) 114 Fed. 373; Re Lewis F. Perry & Whitney Co. (D. C.) 172 Fed. 744.
No further suggestions having been made by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re BedingfieldDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1899
- In re RyanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1902
- In re PerryDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1909
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Diamond Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- In re MaryanovDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- In re Kootenai Motor Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1930
- In re SeifredDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
- In Re Diamond Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925