Lewis v. Jones
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Polk Circuit Court; James S. Steel, Judge; The facts developed in evidence on the second trial are substantially the same as on the first trial. The law as declared by this court on first appeal is the law of the case now. 89 Ark. 368; 92 Ark. 350; Id. 554, 55§-
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, J.. This is the second appeal in this case. When the case was here before, this court reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for new trial for error of the court in giving a peremptory instruction in favor of the plaintiff. On the second trial plaintiff again asked a peremptory instruction, which the court refused. Appellant here, who was appellee on the first appeal, contends that the ruling of the court in refusing the peremptory instruction was error.
The issues and facts on the first appeal are stated in the opinion to be found in 89 Ark 368 (Jones v. Lewis). The issues are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. LewisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Chilton v. HalsteadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re State to Issue Bonds to Fund IndebtednessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Morgan Engineering Co. v. Cache River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Arkansas Natural Gas Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914