Hart v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HABPBB, Judge.
Appellant was prosecuted and convicted of perjury, and has appealed to this court.
The main attack is made on the sufficiency of the indictment, and we copy herein that portion to which the exception relates: “. . • . at and upon the trial of the said issue so joined between the parties as aforesaid it then and there became and was a material question whether said Matilda Williams was on and near the corner and intersection of East Fifth Street and Bed Biver Street in Austin, Travis County, Texas, on the 8th day of August, A. D. 1913, between nine and eleven o’clock p. m. and did…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- State v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1866
- McCoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Wynne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Wynne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Wooten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Wooten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922