Legal Opinion

People v. Henley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 1974No. Docket 18319PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarland, J.

The defendant was charged and convicted in a nonjury trial of the unlawful delivery of heroin in violation of the provisions of MCLA 335.341; MSA 18.1070 (41) (controlled substances act of 1971). The defendant appeals as a matter of right.

The charged offense occurred on June 12, 1972 and while admitting the delivery of heroin on that date, the defendant raises the defense of entrapment. Because of this admission, there is little dispute, if any, concerning the essential facts in this case, but since our determination of this issue must rest upon the particular facts attendant hereto, these…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Osborn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. JamiesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. FrakerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. CushmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. DuisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. WisneskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API