Legal Opinion

Akalski v. Counsell

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alan D. Scheinkman, J.

Motion by defendant Kyle Lipton for an order (1) pursuant to CPLR 3124, compelling plaintiffs to provide medical authorizations as requested by defendants which are compliant with both HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, codified in part at 42 USC § 1320d et seq.) and Arons v Jutkowitz (9 NY3d 393 [2007]), and permitting movant’s counsel to interview plaintiffs treating physicians, or in the alternative, (2) pursuant to CPLR 3042 and 3126, precluding plaintiffs from offering proof at trial, and (3) pursuant to 22 NYCRR…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Arons v. JutkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Tirado v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Kish v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sims v. ReyesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API