Legal Opinion

Skouras v. Brut Productions, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1974PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLupiano, J.

In this case, the complaint, predicated on a written employment agreement between defendant Brut Productions, Inc. and plaintiff, contains six causes of action. As a consequence of Brut’s termination of plaintiff’s employment, plaintiff in the first five causes of action, which are asserted solely against Brut, seeks: .(1) back pay for his last month of employment, (2) severance pay of over $50,000 in accordance with the agreement, (3) reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the course of employment, (4) reimbursement for additional items billed after termination and (5)…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ebasco Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. John C. Supermarket, Inc. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Shaitelman v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. Ivan Mogull Music Corp. v. Madison-59th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Marvex Processing & Finishing Corp. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API