Skouras v. Brut Productions, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLupiano, J.
In this case, the complaint, predicated on a written employment agreement between defendant Brut Productions, Inc. and plaintiff, contains six causes of action. As a consequence of Brut’s termination of plaintiff’s employment, plaintiff in the first five causes of action, which are asserted solely against Brut, seeks: .(1) back pay for his last month of employment, (2) severance pay of over $50,000 in accordance with the agreement, (3) reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the course of employment, (4) reimbursement for additional items billed after termination and (5)…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Ebasco Services, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- John C. Supermarket, Inc. v. New York Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Shaitelman v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Ivan Mogull Music Corp. v. Madison-59th Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Marvex Processing & Finishing Corp. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.