Legal Opinion · Dissent
Crenshaw v. Crenshaw
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided August 26, 1994No. 1930606Published
1Dissent
I respectfully dissent. Because this case was heard without a jury, I would affirm the trial court's judgment under theore tenus rule. I would also allow the personal representative of a deceased client to claim the attorney-client privilege.
"Under the 'ore tenus rule,' a presumption of correctness accompanies the trial court's judgment when it has made findings of fact based on oral testimony without a jury, and its judgment will not be reversed unless it is shown to be plainly and palpably wrong, considering all of the evidence and all inferences that can be logically drawn from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clark v. Albertville Nursing Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- King v. Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- McCrary v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.