Thomas v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
At Law. Action by Maud M. Thomas, as administratrix of the estate of Ernest H. Thomas, deceased, against the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Company. On motion of plaintiff to remand.
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff, a citizen of Iowa, in the district court of Iowa in and for Linn county, August 23, 1912, and was, in due time, removed by the defendant to this court.
The petition is in two counts, the first of which alleges: That the plaintiff is the duly appointed and legally qualified administratrix in the state of Iowa of the estate of Ernest H. Thomas, deceased, and that defendant is a railway corporation engaged as a common carrier by railroad in interstate commerce. That one of its lines of railway extends from Chicago, in the state of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Bankson v. Illinois Cent. R.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1912
3Cited by10 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. DormanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Crevelli v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Hogan v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Rogers v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- O'Callaghan v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.