Radt v. Rosenfeld
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from affirmance by the City Court, General Term, of a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The evidence shows that the firm of Kehr & Goetz, of Antwerp, had certain transactions with one Jules Gigleux for the purchase and sale of coffee upon the basis of one per cent, commission to the defendant, one-fourth of which was paid by him to Gigleux. There were four contracts in all. Hpon three of them there was a profit, and upon one a loss. The net gain to Kehr A Goetz was $529.27, for which the plaintiff, their assignee, recovered the judgment appealed from.
The material point at issue was whether Gigleux was acting as agent for the defendant in making the purchases and sales, so as to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richards v. . MillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Oregon Steamship Co. v. OtisNew York Supreme Court · 1883