Legal Opinion
Yocom v. Franklin County Fiscal Court
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 3, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court sitting En Banc:
PARK, Judge.
These two appeals involve a construction of CR 73.03, as amended by the Supreme Court, effective July 1, 1976. In each case, a motion to dismiss the appeal has been filed on the ground that the notice of appeal failed to specify all of the appellees as required by CR 73.03.
In No. CA-300-MR, James R. Yocom Commissioner, etc. v. Franklin County Fiscal Court et al., the body of the notice of appeal contained only the following statement:
“Notice is hereby given that James R. Yocom, Commissioner of Labor, on behalf of Rick Burke, James…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Electric Plant Board of the City of Hopkinsville v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
- Mitchell v. White Consolidated, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- Richardson v. HobackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- Milligan v. Schenley Distillers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
- Ryan v. Fast Lane, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
- Flick v. Estate of WittichKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- R.L.W. v. Cabinet for Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
- Schulz v. ChadwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.