Legal Opinion
State Ex rel. Noble v. Atkinson
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1940No. Nos. 3062, 3063, 3064, 3081PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HORNBECK, PJ.
The above entitled and numbered actions are in mandamus to restore relators to their positions in the classified service with the Bureau of Unemployment Compensation of the State of Ohio.
Noble claims to have been illegally removed as a Senior Interviewer of the Columbus office after he had served his probationary period of 90 days; Mallery, a Senior Interviewer in the Columbus office, Loeb and Don Durant, Junior Interviewers in the Columbus office, make like claims.
We have but one Bill of Exceptions which purports to '«ave been made in all of the cases. The testimony,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Reeder v. Muninicpal Civil Service Commission, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1958
- State, Ex Rel. Kelley v. HillOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
- Kluth v. AndrusOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- State ex rel. McLaughlin v. BabbOhio Court of Appeals · 1947