Legal Opinion

In Re Pagliughi

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 18, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On order to show cause why respondent should not be disciplined.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sohettino, J.

We issued an order to show cause, dated May 3, 1962, why respondent, a former magistrate, should not he disbarred or otherwise disciplined and why he should not be held in contempt of the Supreme Court for violating Canon 28 of the Canons of Judicial Ethics which provides:

“28. Partisan Politics.
“While entitled to entertain his personal views of political questions, and while not required to surrender his rights or opinions as a citizen, it is inevitable that suspicion of being warped by political bias will attach to a judge who becomes the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re MatteraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. State v. WassermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  3. In Re LRSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Walker v. GiardinaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. LantzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. In re BoggiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  4. In Re HaydenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Matter of FensterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API