Legal Opinion

State v. Pandolfo

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1959No. Cr. 292Published

1Opinion of the Court

98 N.W.2d 161 (1959)

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Samuel C. Parker PANDOLFO, Jr., Defendant and Appellant.

Cr. No. 292.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

August 31, 1959.

Leslie R. Burgum, Atty. Gen., William S. Murray, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., and Francis Breidenbach, Asst. Atty. Gen., for plaintiff and respondent.

E. J. McIlraith, Minot, and William R. Mills, Bismarck, for defendant and appellant.

MORRIS, Judge.

This is a criminal action. The defendant was found guilty by a jury of knowingly subscribing to or making or causing to be made material false statements and representations…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PolianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. People v. SpegalIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Kessler v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. FalkovitchIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API