Legal Opinion

United States v. Saks

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1925No. 2637PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Imported merchandise, described in the invoice as “shoe buckles,” was assessed for duty by the collector at 80 per centum ad valorem as articles in chief value of metal to be worn on or about or attached to the person, under paragraph 1428 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which is as follows:

Par. 1428. * * * and articles valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces, designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to the person, such as and including buckles, card cases, chains, cigar cases, cigar cutters, cigar holders, cigarette cases, cigarette holders, coin…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pritchard & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. WeissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. Hampton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Miller & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Curtis & Von Bernuth Mfg. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  4. Gimbel Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  5. Jorelle Bags, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API