Legal Opinion

Rozelle v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1959No. 15963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RENFRO, Justice.

On March 11, 1936, S. D. Smith, single, executed a general warranty deed to his daughter, Erma Smith Rozelle, and her husband, George F. Rozelle, Jr., which conveyed 128 acres of land known as the Rhinehardt place. In 19S0, A. Merrill Smith sued the Rozelles, with prayer that the property be partitioned between the heirs of S. D. Smith, that the 1936 deed be declared a mortgage and set aside as a deed. Edna Smith Watson and S. D. Smith, Jr., were made parties defendant but as of the date of trial they were in the position of plaintiffs and will be referred to as such. Mrs.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aultman v. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Chandler v. WelbornTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Anglin v. Cisco Mortgage Loan Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Loving v. MillikenTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Moreland v. BarnhartTexas Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rosestone Properties, Inc. v. Schliemann, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1983
  2. Trans-State Pavers, Inc. v. Haynes, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991
  3. Defoeldvar v. DefoeldvarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Purnell v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API