Legal Opinion

Farmers' State Bank v. Northern Trust Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1928No. 1465PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Chief Justice.

This is an action to cancel a certain guaranty agreement signed by E. H. Luikart and Oscar W. Nicholson, and to declare their rights and those of plaintiff bank arising out of that transaction and related ones. The court refused plaintiffs any relief and dismissed the petition. From this judgment an appeal has been taken to this court. The only point argued is the failure of the court to cancel the guaranty agreement hereinafter mentioned. The Farmers State Bank of Riverton, one of plaintiffs in the court below, will be referred to herein as the “Bank;” the Northern Trust…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Callanan v. . K., A.C. L.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Farmers State Bank v. HaunWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Haydon v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  5. Webb v. CashWyoming Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1934
  2. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. OkieWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Northern Arapaho Tribe, a Federally-Recognized Indian Tribe and the Wind River Hotel & Casino, an Enterprise Wholly Owned By an Arm of the Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Baldwin, Crocker & Rudd, P.C. and Kelly RuddWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. OkieWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. OkieWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API