Legal Opinion

Reisberg v. Walters

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1940No. 8217PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

In an appeal from a judgment in a tort action for damages growing out of an automobile collision, the appellant complains of the inadequacy of the verdict in her favor. The record being devoid of other assignments of error, with no issues otherwise preserved for review, the appeal presents the single question whether the court erred in denying a motion for a new trial on the ground of the inadequacy of the verdict, the contention being that the jury disregarded the instructions of the court, and that the verdict was the result of compromise and dictated by prejudice. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Railroad Co. v. FraloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Camp v. GressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Burrell v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Dr. v. J. Devine, and Cross-Appellee v. James S. Patteson, Jr., and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  3. Raymond Parker v. Loren WidemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Ainsley Traylor, an Infant by Next of Friend, Joyce Day v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  5. Spero-Nelson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1949

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API