Legal Opinion

State v. Chinn

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 10, 2012No. 2011-KK-2043PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIMER, Justice.

|1 We granted certiorari to resolve a dispute as to the proper application of La. Const, art. I, § 17 in the factual setting of this case. Article I, § 17 was amended in 2010 to provide that “[ejxcept in capital cases, a defendant may knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a trial by jury but no later than forty-five days prior to the trial date and the waiver shall be irrevocable.” 1 Specifically, we granted certio-rari to determine whether, consistent with this constitutional provision, a defendant loses the right to waive a trial by jury when the initial trial date…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  4. Ocean Energy v. Plaquemines Parish Gvmt.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  5. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BazileSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
  2. State ex rel. J.M.Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
  3. State v. CarterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. State v. PrudhommeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. State of Louisiana v. Dominick SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API