Legal Opinion

Whitcher v. Whitcher

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The parties agreed to the following case, viz : The plaintiffs action is founded upon an award of arbitrators made upon a submission ill writing which is as follows : Submission.

Read the full summary

The parties agreed to the following case, viz : The plaintiffs action is founded upon an award of arbitrators made upon a submission ill writing which is as follows : Submission. “ Know all men by these presents, that whereas differences and disputes, have been, and are yet, depending and unsettled between Chase Whitcher and Daniel Whitcher, for the settling and determining whereof the said parties have submitted themselves and become bound, each to the other, by these presents, the day of the date hereof, in the sum of five hundred dollars, to obey, observe, perform and abide by, and keep…

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

We can discover no valid objection to the form of the plaintiff’s action, nor to the form or substance of his declaration. The general and the special counts seem to be well stated and sufficient to support the cause of action to which they are severally applicable.

This is a parol submission and award. [Chitty on Contracts 4. Oates v. Bromil, Salk. 75.

A submission is a contract between two or more parties, whereby they agree to refer the subject in dispute to others and to be bound by their award, and the submission itself implies an agreement to abide the result, even if no such agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York & Cumberland R. Co. v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Lyle v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  3. Waite v. BarryNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  4. Liotard v. GravesNew York Supreme Court · 1805
  5. Brown v. HankersonNew York Supreme Court · 1824

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ohio Council 8, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Ohio Department of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API