Webb v. Till
Supreme Court of Georgia
Partition. Before Judge Park. Turner superior court.
1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, J.
A petition for partition was filed. Attached to it was a copy of an alleged deed under which the petitioner claimed that she acquired an undivided interest in the land. The petition *389was not required by law to be verified, nor was it so. The writ of partition was issued, and the partitioners made a return. The person alleged to be a tenant in common with the applicant filed objections to the petition and return, including what was termed an answer to the petition. On the trial a motion was made to dismiss the objections and also the “answer,” on the ground that they did not deny xxnder oath…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Minor v. FincherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SouthwickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- McCall v. AsburySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
- Rogers v. EasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Peeples v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.