Legal Opinion

Floyd v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided February 13, 1996No. 06-95-00069-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

This is a securities fraud case. Randal Floyd was charged with violating the Texas Securities Act. 1

The indictment alleged that Floyd defrauded Jack Isaminger by selling him a partnership interest in an oil and gas lease while intentionally failing to disclose to Isaminger that funds previously invested in the partnership for acquiring and reworking a well in St. Martin Parish, Louisiana were used for purposes other than those for which they were invested.

Floyd entered a nolo contendere plea before the court. The court found sufficient evidence to find him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Gallardo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  3. Beaird v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  4. Beaird v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Floyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API