Legal Opinion

Burns v. Meadors

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 20, 1956No. 5-837PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

Appellees, O. D. Meadors and his wife, instituted this action against appellant, Lavada M. Burns, ashing a rescission of a contract under the terms of which appellees agreed to purchase certain lands belonging to appellant and ashing for damages, and, in lieu thereof, for damages to compensate for defects in the title. The issues were tried and judgment was rendered in favor of appellees, on the basis of a rescission and damages. From a decree in favor of appellees appellant prosecutes this appeal.

The complaint alleges that a written contract was entered into on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Highway Commission v. ByarsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  2. Bonacci v. CerraNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Texas Illinois Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. LawhonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Robinson v. BresslerNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. Burks Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  2. Sorrells v. Bailey Cattle Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. GladdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  4. Heifner v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  5. International Harvester Co. v. Burks Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API