Legal Opinion

Franko v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 2, 1988No. 1 CA-CIV 9225Published

1Opinion of the Court

158 Ariz. 391 (1988)

762 P.2d 1345

Circie FRANKO, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

James M. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 1 CA-CIV 9225.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A.

June 2, 1988.

Petition and Cross-Petition for Review Denied November 8, 1988.[*]

Pasquale R. Cheche and Paul G. Ulrich, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant.

Jennings, Strouss & Salmon by William T. Birmingham, M. Byron Lewis and Geoffrey R. Hamlin, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee.

OPINION

GREER, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Circie Franko brings this appeal from summary judgment entered in favor of defendant James M. Mitchell…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Heyer v. FlaigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Page v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. DeVaux v. American Home Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API