Legal Opinion

Kevorkian v. Peter Paul, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 5, 1985No. 2210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and we find that the decision of the compensation review division is correct in law. General Statutes § 31-301b. The finding did not include facts found without evidence nor did it fail to include material facts which are admitted or undisputed. Grady v. St. Mary’s Hospital, 179 Conn. 662, 666, 427 A.2d 842 (1980); Wheat v. Red Star Express Lines, 156 Conn. 245, 248, 240 A.2d 859 (1968).

There is no error.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheat v. Red Star Express LinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  2. Grady v. St. Mary's HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeBarros v. A. L. SingletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  2. Bucko v. City of New LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988