Legal Opinion

Ostrander v. City of Syracuse

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs. The broad discretion of Special Term and the like discretion of the Appellate Division in review of the granting of leave to serve a late notice of claim, was recently restated by this court (see Matter of Murray v. City of New York, 30 N Y 2d 113, 119). The incapacities of the claimant, not those of his lawyer, are the relevant considerations under ^ subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. And there was certainly insufficient in the record to compel a finding • that the failure to serve…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. Village of Tupper Lake Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Sherman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Sherman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API