Legal Opinion

United States v. Woolery

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 8, 1978No. 34,267; CM 434673PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COOK, Judge:

Appellant was tried by a general court-martial with members for the rape of Ms. Werner; an assault with the intent to rape Ms. Daubenmerkl; and the obstruction of justice, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 920 and 934, respectively. He was acquitted of assault and obstructing justice, but was found guilty of rape. We granted review to determine two issues arising out of use of evidence of other acts of uncharged misconduct. We conclude that the admission of two incidents of alleged mis*32conduct was improper and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  2. United States v. GaiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. KirbyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  5. United States v. WooleryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. WingartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. GambleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. CooperU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. DiazU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API