Legal Opinion

Clapp v. Tower

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District court, Cass county; Charles A. Pollo'ck, J. Action by Isaac P. Clapp against Charlemange Tower, Jr., and others. Demurrer to answer sustained, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a section of land situate in Cass county, which was conveyed to the plaintiff ¡by the executors of the last will and testament of Charlemange Tower, deceased. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is the owner of said real estate, and that the defendants claim an interest therein adverse to the plaintiff, and prays that they be required to set forth their claims, to the -end that their validity may be determined, and that title be quieted in the plaintiff. Defendants, in their answer, allege that they are the next of kin and all of the heirs at law of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kerr v. DaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
  2. Williams v. . HaddockNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Penfield v. TowerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Woodward v. McCollumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Henry S. Grinde Corporation v. KlindworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Green v. GustafsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kern v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  5. United Bank of Bismarck v. TroutNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API