Teller v. Bishop
Supreme Court of Minnesota
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COUET OF RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and Authorities of Plaintiff in Error. The Plaintiff in Error malíes tbe following points and grounds for tbe reversal of the judgment rendered in favor of Defendants : I. — Tbe facts found by the Referee show that said purchase and conveyance of the real estate described, was fraudulent as against tbe creditors of said Bishop, and that tbe conclusions of law in said Report contained to the contrary are erroneous and not…
Read the full summary
ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COUET OF RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and Authorities of Plaintiff in Error. The Plaintiff in Error malíes tbe following points and grounds for tbe reversal of the judgment rendered in favor of Defendants : I. — Tbe facts found by the Referee show that said purchase and conveyance of the real estate described, was fraudulent as against tbe creditors of said Bishop, and that tbe conclusions of law in said Report contained to the contrary are erroneous and not warranted. n. — Tbe record shows tbe Plaintiff’s indebtedness was created August 11th, 1857 ; that a judgment, as…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Atwater, J.
It appears from the complaint that the Plaintiff, Teller, is a resident of the State of Iowa; and that on the 1st of February, 1860, he recovered a judgment in the District Court in and for the Second Judicial District of this State, against the Defendant, Charles Bishop, for the sum of $614.14. founded upon an indebtedness contracted by the said Defendant, August 21, 1857. An execution was issued upon the judgment previous to the commencement of this action, which was returned wholly unsatisfied. It is also alleged that the Defendant is indebted to the Plaintiff in…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. TierneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Cooper v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Haubrich v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924