Legal Opinion

Galauska v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1975No. 2027PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FITZGERALD, Justice.

Walter Mack Galauska has petitioned for rehearing of this court’s affirmance of his conviction for manslaughter.1 Galauska v. State, 527 P.2d 459 (Alaska 1974). He now claims that the court misapplied the law on accomplices and failed to deal with the issue raised in his brief concerning the jury instruction that witnesses are presumed to speak the truth. Finding no misapplication of the law, the petition is denied as to' the accomplice issue. We grant a rehearing on the witness instruction and modify our opinion.

Petitioner argues that the trial court committed prejudicial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Galauska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Potts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
  2. Oksoktaruk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Young v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Stumpf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  5. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API