Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burnett v. Department of Employment & Training Services

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1990No. 93A02-8805-EX-204Published

1DissentRobertson, Judge

I respectfully dissent for the reason that Burnett was properly discharged upon stated grounds which have a basis in fact and were duly proven. Voss v. Review Bd. *82Dept. of Emp. & Tr. (1989), Ind.App., 533 N.E.2d 1020. The other grounds of tardiness and glue sniffing should be treated as surplusage.

I would affirm.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Voss v. REVIEW BD. DEPT. OF EMP. & TR. SERV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989