Legal Opinion · Dissent
Burnett v. Department of Employment & Training Services
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 1990No. 93A02-8805-EX-204Published
1DissentRobertson, Judge
I respectfully dissent for the reason that Burnett was properly discharged upon stated grounds which have a basis in fact and were duly proven. Voss v. Review Bd. *82Dept. of Emp. & Tr. (1989), Ind.App., 533 N.E.2d 1020. The other grounds of tardiness and glue sniffing should be treated as surplusage.
I would affirm.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Voss v. REVIEW BD. DEPT. OF EMP. & TR. SERV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989