State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ROSALYN B. BELL, Judge.
This case presents the question of whether a taxpayer can get a double benefit from a net operating loss because of an ambiguous Maryland franchise tax form. In June of 1988, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City determined that Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Association (Loyola) was entitled to such a deduction. We conclude that no such double benefit is available.
At issue in this appeal is the starting point in the calculation of the Maryland Franchise Tax. This issue arises because of a poorly drafted state franchise tax form. Line 1 of the state franchise tax form…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shatney v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Lyon v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Beeman v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Dun & Bradstreet Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991