Legal Opinion

State Department of Assessments & Taxation v. Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 5, 1989No. 1005, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSALYN B. BELL, Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a taxpayer can get a double benefit from a net operating loss because of an ambiguous Maryland franchise tax form. In June of 1988, the Circuit Court for Baltimore City determined that Loyola Federal Savings & Loan Association (Loyola) was entitled to such a deduction. We conclude that no such double benefit is available.

At issue in this appeal is the starting point in the calculation of the Maryland Franchise Tax. This issue arises because of a poorly drafted state franchise tax form. Line 1 of the state franchise tax form…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Commissioner v. GroetzingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Commissioner v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shatney v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  2. Lyon v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Beeman v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API