Legal Opinion
Zinke & Trumbo, Ltd. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'n
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided January 15, 1988No. 60,326PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Herd, J.:
This is an appeal from the order of the district court affirming the Basic Proration Order (BPO) of the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) pertaining to the Fincham O’Brien-Barby Morrow Gas Field in Meade County.
The facts from which this controversy arose are as follows: In October of 1983, appellant Zinke & Trumbo Ltd., drilled and began production of its O’Brien-Barby 1-32 gas well in the center of the NW/4 NW/4 of Section 32, Township 34S, Range 26W, Meade County. It produced 6.8 mmcf per day open flow from the Morrow sand. Zinke proceeded…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pork Motel, Corp. v. Kansas Department of Health & EnvironmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- State of New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Northern Natural Gas Company v. L.D. Drilling, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Vakas v. Kansas Board of Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Sunflower Racing, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Peck v. University Residence CommitteeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Crawford v. Kansas Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.