Hord v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

1. The judge presiding when this case was first tried in the municipal court of Atlanta properly allowed the amendments to the original petition, and the petition as amended was not subject to any ground of the demurrer, nor was it subject to dismissal upon the ground that the “plaintiff’s petition as amended did not set forth a legal cause of action against these defendants,”

*733Decided November 14, 1928. McDaniel & Neely, Thomas M. Stubbs, for plaintiffs in error. Shelf er & Dunaway, Bryan & MiddlebrooJcs, contra.

2. Neither of the two grounds of the motion for a new trial in the municipal court…