Legal Opinion

State v. Beard

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1997No. S-6378, S-6438PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is the third appeal involving Burle Beard’s claims against the State of Alaska and several State employees. See Beard v. Baum, 796 P.2d 1844 (Alaska 1990) (Beard I); Cameron v. Beard, 864 P.2d 538 (Alaska 1993) (Beard II). In Beard II, we remanded for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Beard’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies barred his claims. The superior court excused Beard’s failure to exhaust. The State and the individual defendants now appeal this ruling (and others). Beard’s consolidated cross-appeal argues that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Eidelson v. ArcherAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Cameron v. BeardAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Casey v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Hydaburg v. Hydaburg Cooperative Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Nickerson v. University of Alaska AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BeardAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API