Legal Opinion

Francisco J. Toledo-Méndez, et al. v. Anaís Rodríguez-Vega; Damaris Miranda-Maisonave

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided August 10, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01462Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO-MÉNDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL NO. 24-1462 (RAM) ANAIS RODRÍGUEZ-VEGA; DAMARIS MIRANDA-MAISONAVE, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER RAÚL M. ARIAS-MARXUACH, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Defendants Anaís Rodríguez-Vega (“Rodríguez-Vega”) and Damaris Miranda-Maisonave (“Miranda- Maisonave”), (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss or Transfer to Title III Court (the “Motion”). For the reasons outlined below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Ocasio-Hernandez v. Fortuno-BursetCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API