Legal Opinion

State v. Scogin

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 7, 1981No. 2 CA-CR 2299Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

The sole question on this appeal by the state is whether there is a statutory minimum period of probation under the new criminal code. The trial court rejected the state’s position that there is, and we agree.

Appellee pled no contest to the crime of fraudulent scheme or artifice, a class 2 felony, was adjudged guilty, and was placed on probation for two years. The state contends that the trial court was required to impose probation for not less than 5.25 years which is the minimum period of imprisonment for a class 2 felony.

The trial court’s power with respect to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarterArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API