Consolidation Coal Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
FUTEY, Judge.
These cases come before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment, filed in all of the above-captioned cases. Plaintiffs are coal producers that believe fees they paid violate the Export Clause of the Constitution.
The Court had stayed the cases pending resolution of Consolidation Coal Company v. United States, No. 01-254 (Fed. Cl. filed Apr. 27, 2001) (“Case No. 01-254”). In that case, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed this Court’s entry of judgment in favor of the government, Consolidation Coal. Co. v. United States, 615 F.3d 1378…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cyprus Amax Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clinchfield Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Red River Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012