Ramivitch v. United States

Ekwall, Judge:

Plaintiffs in this case claim that the currency of the invoice was improperly converted into United States dollars and that the provisions of section 522 of the Tariff Act of 1930 were not followed. In an amendment to the protest, it is claimed that an attempted second appraisement was illegal and void and that liquidation based thereon is likewise illegal.

The collector’s report states that the authority of the agents to file the protest has not been established. We note that the protest is signed:

Jack Ramivitch and Boris Erwitt

1975 No. Bbechwood Drive, Los Angeles

W. J. Byrnes &…