Legal Opinion

Jemison v. Crichlow

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1989PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.

We agree with so much of the opinion of Justice Lawrence J. Bracken at the Appellate Division (139 AD2d 332) that *728holds that actions against the City Marshal for acts done in an official capacity or by omission of an official duty and based on common law must be instituted within the one-year period provided by CPLR 215 (1). Plaintiff’s cause of action based upon 42 USC § 1983 is not before us.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jemison v. CrichlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Schonberger v. SerchukDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Soucie v. County of MonroeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1990
  4. Gold v. SchusterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Rivera v. Wyckoff Heights HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API